SNIPPET

January 29, 2007

Thank You - You Know Who You Are

I had a really nice voicemail last week about PHOSITA and FedCirc.us – thank you so much for the encouragement and support.

I would really enjoy speaking with you about these projects – but you didn’t leave me a phone number where I could call you back.  So… you know who you are – drop me an email and let me know how I can contact you.

Yes, this does seem extremely mysterious and all… so, if it doesn’t make any sense to you – simply ignore and head over to FedCirc.us for some enlightenment (how is that for a shameless plug?)

Posted by Douglas Sorocco at 09:39 AM.
Permalink: Thank You - You Know Who You Are
| Comments (2)

SNIPPET

November 30, 2006

New Law Jobs posted at LegalMojo

Recent law jobs at LegalMojo  :

• Patent Attorney - INTELLECTUAL LAW GROUP Bellevue, Washington Patent
  
• Prosecution Associates - FENWICK & WEST Mountain View, CA
  
• Patent Prosecution Associate or Agent - VISTA IP LAW GROUP Saratoga, California
  
• Patent Attorney - LONDON London, England
  
• Corporate Associate - GALILEO GROUP Washington, DC
  
• IP Counsel - PROCTER & GAMBLE Cincinnati, OH
  
• Intellectual Property Law and Policy Counsel - IPO Washington, D.C,

Posted by Douglas Sorocco at 05:45 PM.
Permalink: New Law Jobs posted at LegalMojo
| Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

SNIPPET

November 04, 2006

Inventor article : snarky or inspiring?

An uplifting inventor article? 

Well, the Northwest Indiana News has an interesting way to lead into a story:

Herbert Bigelow has an invention. So what. He also has a patent pending. Big deal.

And I thought PHOSITA could get a bit snarky from time to time.

Posted by Douglas Sorocco at 08:05 PM.
Permalink: Inventor article : snarky or inspiring?
| Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

SNIPPET

November 01, 2006

A Patent Application or a Soapbox?

Wow... wow.... all I can say is ... wow.

U.S. Patent Application No. 2004/0161257 has this little nugget in it as claim number 9.

I applaud whoever drafted the application for their sense of spunk, but you really have to wonder.... what were they thinking?

Personally, if there was an oath/declaration signed by the inventor (also -- PDF version) and filed in the application stating that the inventor had read and understood the application to accurately reflect their invention - I would be worried that claim 9 could cause some problems down the line.

Once again... wow... all I can say is ... wow.

Posted by Douglas Sorocco at 02:11 PM.
Permalink: A Patent Application or a Soapbox?
| Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)